OrinovateOrinovate
Metal AM
LPBF
DMLS
Alloy Selection
Post-Processing

Metal 3D Printing Materials Guide

Metal 3D Printing Materials Guide

Metal AM cannot be selected from the highest datasheet value alone. Service temperature, load, chemical exposure, process and inspection method define the practical shortlist.

Three key takeaways
  • Define function, environment, quantity and risk before selecting a material or process.
  • Treat typical values as comparison points; confirm the exact grade and supplier capability before release.
  • Use a first article or pilot lot to verify dimensions, function and records before scaling.
A metal powder-bed fusion build plate lifted from the chamber with brackets still embedded in powder.
LPBF dominates the metal-AM conversation because it hits 99.

Define the decision

Document function, environment, quantity and risk so every option is compared against the same requirement.

Metal AM evaluation flow

Define requirements, narrow the material and process, then verify with a consistent acceptance method.

  1. 1Requirements

    Function, environment, quantity and risk

  2. 2Options

    Material, process, design controls and finishing

  3. 3Acceptance

    Dimensions, functional tests and production records

Record these conditions on the drawing, RFQ or validation plan—not only in meeting notes.

Compare the practical options

Compare material, process, design controls and finishing together—not unit price alone.

A copper alloy heat exchanger with printed internal lattice channels.
Copper's conformal-channel heat exchangers are the application that earns LPBF's premium.

Validate before scaling

Before scaling, verify dimensions, function and records with one controlled method across representative lots.

Tool Steels and Cobalt Chrome: The Specialists

Maraging steel (MS1 / 18Ni300) prints readily and ages to HRC 50–54 with minimal dimensional change — the classic choice for conformal-cooled injection-mould inserts. H13 is the hot-work reference, used in die-casting inserts and hot forging tools, hardening to HRC 52 after quench and temper.

Recommended practiceCommon mistake
Document function, environment, quantity and riskSelect from a material name or machine specification alone
Review material, process, design controls and finishing togetherAddress manufacturing limits only after design freeze
Inspect critical dimensions and function on the first articleScale production from visual approval alone
Keep material, revision and inspection recordsReuse old results after a material or process change
Use the same decision logic from RFQ through first article and later lots.
  • Function, environment, quantity and risk are documented
  • Material, process, design controls and finishing are reviewed with the supplier
  • Critical dimensions, appearance and functional acceptance are on the drawing or RFQ
  • First-article or pilot-lot verification is planned
  • Material, process and revision changes trigger a new review

FAQ, further reading and sources

What should be defined first for Metal AM?

Start with function, environment, quantity and acceptance criteria. These inputs narrow the practical options faster than naming a machine or material first.

Can typical values in this article be released directly on a drawing?

No. Use them for early comparison, then confirm the exact grade, supplier capability and first-article result.

When is the process ready to scale?

Scale only after material, process, finishing and inspection are controlled and repeatable across representative lots.

Next, explore 3D printing services, CNC machining, materials, and the related reports linked on this page.